Follow-up question: it seems that range queries on the *second* field of a CompositeType(UUIDType(), UUIDType()) do not work.

If I concatenate the two UUID.hex values into a 32-character string instead of a CompositeType of two UUIDs, then range queries work correctly.

This is illustrated below... so the question is: what is the point of a CompositeType if range queries only work on the first field? Is it just a convenience class for keeping things strongly typed and cleanly organized, or did I break something in the way I setup CompositeType in the example earlier in this thread?


def join_uuids(*uuids):
    return ''.join(map(attrgetter('hex'), uuids))

def split_uuids(uuid_str):
    return map(lambda s: uuid.UUID(hex=''.join(s)), grouper(uuid_str, 32))

def grouper(iterable, n, fillvalue=None):
    "Collect data into fixed-length chunks or blocks"
    # grouper('ABCDEFG', 3, 'x') --> ABC DEF Gxx
    args = [iter(iterable)] * n
    return itertools.izip_longest(fillvalue=fillvalue, *args)

def 
test_composite_column_names_second_level_range_query_with_decomposited_keys():
    '''
    check that we can execute range queries on the second part of a
    CompositeType column name after we unpack the composite key into a
    long string of concatenated hex forms of the UUIDs
    '''
    sm = SystemManager(chosen_server)
    sm.create_keyspace(namespace, SIMPLE_STRATEGY, {'replication_factor': '1'})

    family = 'test'
    sm.create_column_family(
        namespace, family, super=False,
        key_validation_class = ASCII_TYPE,
        default_validation_class = BYTES_TYPE,
        comparator_type=UTF8Type(),
        )
    pool = ConnectionPool(namespace, config['storage_addresses'],
                          max_retries=1000, pool_timeout=10, pool_size=2, 
timeout=120)

    cf = pycassa.ColumnFamily(pool, family)
    u1, u2, u3, u4 = uuid.uuid1(), uuid.uuid1(), uuid.uuid1(), uuid.uuid1()

    cf.insert('inbound', {join_uuids(u1, u2): b''})
    cf.insert('inbound', {join_uuids(u1, u3): b''})
    cf.insert('inbound', {join_uuids(u1, u4): b''})

    ## test range searching
    start  = uuid.UUID(int=u3.int - 1)
    finish = uuid.UUID(int=u3.int + 1)
    assert start.int < u3.int < finish.int
    rec3 = cf.get('inbound',
                  column_start =join_uuids(u1, start),
                  column_finish=join_uuids(u1, finish)).items()
    assert len(rec3) == 1
    assert split_uuids(rec3[0][0])[1] == u3
    ####  This assert above passes!

    ####  This next part fails :-/
    ## now insert many rows -- enough that some should fall in each
    ## subrange below
    for i in xrange(1000):
        cf.insert('inbound', {join_uuids(u1, uuid.uuid4()): b''})

    ## do four ranges, and expect more than zero in each
    step_size = 2**(128 - 2)
    for i in range(2**2, 0, -1):
        start =  uuid.UUID(int=(i-1) * step_size)
        finish = uuid.UUID(int=min(i * step_size, 2**128 - 1))
        recs = cf.get('inbound',
                      column_start =join_uuids(u1, start),
                      column_finish=join_uuids(u1, finish)).items()
        for key, val in recs:
            key = split_uuids(key)
            assert val == b''
            assert key[0] == u1
            assert key[1] < finish
            assert start < key[1]   ## this passes!! (fails with 
CompositeType...)

        assert len(recs) > 0
        print len(recs), ' for ', start, finish

    sm.close()

Reply via email to