Yes my question what about CQL-style columns.
2014-07-04 12:40 GMT+02:00 Jens Rantil <[email protected]>: > Just so you guys aren't misunderstanding each other; Tommaso, you were not > refering to CQL-style columns, right? > > /J > > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Romain HARDOUIN < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Cassandra can handle many more columns (e.g. time series). >> So 100 columns is OK. >> >> Best, >> Romain >> >> >> >> tommaso barbugli <[email protected]> a écrit sur 03/07/2014 21:55:18 : >> >> > De : tommaso barbugli <[email protected]> >> > A : [email protected], >> > Date : 03/07/2014 21:55 >> > Objet : Re: keyspace with hundreds of columnfamilies >> > >> > thank you for the replies; I am rethinking the schema design, one >> > possible solution is to "implode" one dimension and get N times less >> CFs. >> >> > With this approach I would come up with (cql) tables with up to 100 >> > columns; would that be a problem? >> > >> > Thank You, >> > Tommaso >> > >> > >
