Checkout differentiators between thrift n cql3. Storage engine is same but they differs in metadata. Prior to 2.0 it was mix of both. I would still suggest the same. Checkout earlier threads around map collection support, bulk loading, dynamic column support comparison b/w thrift and cql3. Ease of use is just a simple aspect. On 28/07/2014 9:21 pm, "bi kro" <hlqvu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi every one, > > I'm newcomer to Cassandra, so I would like to know about performance > between Thrift (Hector) vs CQL3, specially about the speed (Thrift based on > RPC, CQL3 based on binary protocol). > > Currently I'm using Cassandra 1.2 , which version CQL3 of > JavaDriver-Datastax is stable for it? > > Thanks very much >
