AFAIK, it is not. With CAS it should br On 26/08/2014 10:21 pm, "Jaydeep Chovatia" <chovatia.jayd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I have question on inserting multiple cluster keys under same partition > key. > > Ex: > > CREATE TABLE Employee ( > deptId int, > empId int, > name varchar, > address varchar, > salary int, > PRIMARY KEY(deptId, empId) > ); > > BEGIN *UNLOGGED *BATCH > INSERT INTO Employee (deptId, empId, name, address, salary) VALUES (1, > 10, 'testNameA', 'testAddressA', 20000); > INSERT INTO Employee (deptId, empId, name, address, salary) VALUES (1, > 20, 'testNameB', 'testAddressB', 30000); > APPLY BATCH; > > Here we are inserting two cluster keys (10 and 20) under same partition > key (1). > Q1) Is this batch transaction atomic and isolated? If yes then is there > any performance overhead with this syntax? > Q2) Is this CQL syntax can be considered equivalent of Thrift > "batch_mutate"? > > -jaydeep >
