I imagine I’d generally be happy if we were CPU bound :-) … as long as the number of transactions per second is generally reasonable.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > >> Curious what other people have seen here in practice. Are they getting >> comparable performance to RAM in practice? Latencies would be higher of >> course but we’re fine with that. >> > > My understanding is that when one runs Cassandra with SSDs, one replaces > the typical i/o bound with a CPU bound. Cassandra also has various internal > assumptions that do not make best use of the spare i/o available; > SSD+Cassandra has only been deployed at scale for a few years, so this > makes sense. > > =Rob > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
