On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:

> Actually, that's not true either.  It's technically possible for a batch
> to be partially applied in the current implementation, even with logged
> batches.  "atomic" is used incorrectly here, imo, since more than 2 states
> can be visible, unapplied & applied.


That's a matter of isolation, not atomicity.  Although, with a long enough
gap between partial and full application, the distinction becomes somewhat
pedantic, I suppose.


-- 
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax <http://datastax.com/>

Reply via email to