Frens,

What consistency are you querying with? Could be you are simply receiving 
result from different nodes each time.

Jens



–
Skickat från Mailbox

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Mikhail Strebkov <streb...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We have observed the same issue in our production Cassandra cluster (5 nodes 
> in one DC). We use Cassandra 2.1.3 (I joined the list too late to realize we 
> shouldn’t user 2.1.x yet) on Amazon machines (created from community AMI).
> In addition to count variations with 5 to 10% we observe variations for the 
> query “select * from table1 where time > '$fromDate' and time < '$toDate' 
> allow filtering” results. We iterated through the results multiple times 
> using official Java driver. We used that query for a huge data migration and 
> were unpleasantly surprised that it is unreliable. In our case “nodetool 
> repair” didn’t fix the issue.
> So I echo Frens questions.
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Rumph, Frens Jan <m...@frensjan.nl> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is it to be expected that select count(*) from ... and select distinct
>> partition-key-columns from ... to yield inconsistent results between
>> executions even though the table at hand isn't written to?
>> I have a table in a keyspace with replication_factor = 1 which is something
>> like:
>> CREATE TABLE tbl (
>>     id frozen<id_type>,
>>     bucket bigint,
>>     offset int,
>>     value double,
>>     PRIMARY KEY ((id, bucket), offset)
>> )
>> The frozen udt is:
>> CREATE TYPE id_type (
>>     tags map<text, text>
>> );
>> When I do select count(*) from tbl several times the actual count varies
>> with 5 to 10%. Also when performing select distinct id, bucket from tbl the
>> results aren't consistent over several query executions. The table is not
>> being written to at the time I performed the queries.
>> Is this to be expected? Or is this a bug? Is there a alternative method /
>> workaround?
>> I'm using cqlsh 5.0.1 with Cassandra 2.1.2 on 64bit fedora 21 with Oracle
>> Java 1.8.0_31.
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Frens Jan

Reply via email to