Thanks all, I really appreciate the input. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:
> Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for > versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth <krut...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of >>> YCSB bindings for older versions of Cassandra, namely Cassandra 7, 8, and >>> 10. >>> >>> We would like to continue dev and support on these if the use of those >>> versions of Cassandra is still prevalent. If not, then a deprecation cycle >>> may be the best idea, in favor of CQL based bindings for modern versions of >>> Cassandra. >>> >>> Any input from the Cassandra community on how common the usage of >>> Cassandra 7, 8, and 10 are would be very helpful, thanks a lot. >>> >> >> Due to the adoption curve of Cassandra, very few people are left on these >> versions. I very, very rarely encounter questions about the 0.x series here >> or in #cassandra. >> >> Same is true to a slightly lesser extent for 1.0 series. Some shops >> rarely upgrade, but those kinds of shops are unlikely to need rigorous >> performance comparison courtesy of YCSB? >> >> =Rob >> >>
