Ignore this - :)
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Richard L. Burton III <mrbur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Initially, I want to keep costs fairly tight if possible. I plan to use 3 > instances of m1.large servers with 200GB of disk space per instance. The > application will use up this diskspace within the first 4 months. At which > point, I will increase the disk space per node by adding new nodes to the > cluster with larger disks and replace the older instances. > > The general idea is to keep the disk lean until I need to expand them to > 500GB after which I will just add more new nodes to the cluster. > > P.S. I haven't done any benchmarks, but the system won't be too > CPU intensive, so I wanted to expand the capacity of the disks by "doing a > rolling upgrade" until I need to add nodes to the cluster to handle the > large disk spaces (e.g., 500GB per node max) or CPU becomes an issue. > > Does this sound like a good solution? > > -- > -Richard L. Burton III > @rburton > -- -Richard L. Burton III @rburton
