Hi,
That means that some clients closes the connection, have you upgraded all
clients?

Il 30/set/2016 14:25, "Oleg Krayushkin" <[email protected]> ha scritto:

> Hi,
>
> Since the upgrade from Cassandra version 2.2.7 to 3.0.8 We're getting
> following error almost every several minutes on every node. For node at
> 173.170.147.120 error in system.log would be:
>
> INFO  [SharedPool-Worker-4] 2016-09-30 10:26:39,068 Message.java:605
>    - Unexpected exception during request; channel = [id: 0xfd64cd67, 
> /173.170.147.120:50660 :> /18.4.63.191:9042]
> java.io.IOException: Error while read(...): Connection reset by peer
>         at io.netty.channel.epoll.Native.readAddress(Native Method) 
> ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at 
> io.netty.channel.epoll.EpollSocketChannel$EpollSocketUnsafe.doReadBytes(EpollSocketChannel.java:675)
>  ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at 
> io.netty.channel.epoll.EpollSocketChannel$EpollSocketUnsafe.epollInReady(EpollSocketChannel.java:714)
>  ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at 
> io.netty.channel.epoll.EpollEventLoop.processReady(EpollEventLoop.java:326) 
> ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at io.netty.channel.epoll.EpollEventLoop.run(EpollEventLoop.java:264) 
> ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at 
> io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$2.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:116)
>  ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at 
> io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultThreadFactory$DefaultRunnableDecorator.run(DefaultThreadFactory.java:137)
>  ~[netty-all-4.0.23.Final.jar:4.0.23.Final]
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.8.0_91]
>
> As far as I see, in all such errors there are always [id: <...>,
> /<broadcast_address>:<some_port> :> /<listen_address>:<native_
> transport_port>.  Also broadcast_address and listen_address are always
> belong to the current node adresses.
>
> What are possible reasons of such errors and how can I fix it? Any
> thoughts would be appreciated.
>

Reply via email to