I guess the question can be rephrased into "What is the overhead of creating and maintaining an additional table?"
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:12 AM, Ali Akhtar <ali.rac...@gmail.com> wrote: > Depends on the use case. No one right answer. > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Kant Kodali <k...@peernova.com> wrote: > >> If one were given a choice of fitting all the data into one table vs >> fitting the data into two tables while say (keeping all the runtime and >> space complexity for CRUD operations the same in either case) which one >> would you choose and why? >> >> >
