Lol. The counter proof is to use another memory Model like Arc. Thats why i personally think Java is NOT the First choice for Server Applications. But thats a philosophic discussion.
Am 25.11.2016 23:38 schrieb "Kant Kodali" <k...@peernova.com>: > +1 Chris Lohfink response > > I would also restate the following sentence "java GC pauses are pretty > much a fact of life" to "Any GC based system pauses are pretty much a > fact of life". > > I would be more than happy to see if someone can counter prove. > > > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Chris Lohfink <clohfin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> No tuning will eliminate gcs. >> >> 20-30 seconds is horrific and out of the ordinary. Most likely >> implementing antipatterns and/or poorly configured. Sub 1s is realistic but >> with some workloads still may require some tuning to maintain. Some >> workloads are very unfriendly to GCs though (ie heavy tombstones, very wide >> partitions). >> >> Chris >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:25 PM, S Ahmed <sahmed1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> From what I understand java GC pauses are pretty much a fact of life, >>> but you can tune the jvm to reduce the likelihood of the frequency and >>> length of GC pauses. >>> >>> When using Cassandra, how frequent or long have these pauses known to >>> be? Even with tuning, is it safe to assume they cannot be eliminated? >>> >>> Would a 20-30 second pause be something out of the ordinary? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >
