Are you looking this to be equivalent to (PK1=1 AND PK2=2) or are you
looking for (PK1 IN (1,2) AND PK2 IN (1,2)) or something else?

Cheers
Ben

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 at 20:09 Benjamin Roth <benjamin.r...@jaumo.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> CQL says this is not allowed:
>
> DELETE FROM ks.cf WHERE (pk1, pk2) IN ((1, 2));
>
> 1. Is there a reason for it? There shouldn't be a performance penalty, it
> is a PK lookup, the same thing works with a single pk column
> 2. Is there a known workaround for it?
>
> It would be much of a help to have it for daily business, IMHO it's a
> waste of resources to run multiple queries just to fetch a bunch of records
> by a PK.
>
> Thanks in advance for any reply
>
> --
> Benjamin Roth
> Prokurist
>
> Jaumo GmbH · www.jaumo.com
> Wehrstraße 46 · 73035 Göppingen · Germany
> Phone +49 7161 304880-6 <+49%207161%203048806> · Fax +49 7161 304880-1
> <+49%207161%203048801>
> AG Ulm · HRB 731058 · Managing Director: Jens Kammerer
>
-- 
————————
Ben Slater
Chief Product Officer
Instaclustr: Cassandra + Spark - Managed | Consulting | Support
+61 437 929 798

Reply via email to