Which version are you running? I got stuck in a similar situation (With a
lot more nodes) and the only way to make it good was to stop the whole
cluster, start nodes 1 by 1.



Regards,

Carlos Juzarte Rolo
Cassandra Consultant / Datastax Certified Architect / Cassandra MVP

Pythian - Love your data

rolo@pythian | Twitter: @cjrolo | Skype: cjr2k3 | Linkedin:
*linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo
<http://linkedin.com/in/carlosjuzarterolo>*
Mobile: +351 918 918 100
www.pythian.com

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Pradeep Chhetri <prad...@stashaway.com>
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> We had some issues yesterday in our 3 nodes cluster where the application
> tried to create the same table twice quickly and cluster became unstable.
>
> Temporarily, we reduced it to single node cluster which gave us some
> relief.
>
> Now when we are trying to bootstrap a new node and add it to cluster.
> we're seeing schema mismatch issue.
>
> # nodetool status
> Datacenter: datacenter1
> =======================
> Status=Up/Down
> |/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
> --  Address        Load       Tokens       Owns (effective)  Host ID
>                          Rack
> UN  10.42.247.173  3.07 GiB   256          100.0%
> dffc39e5-d4ba-4b10-872e-0e3cc10f5e08  rack1
> UN  10.42.209.245  2.25 GiB   256          100.0%
> 9b99d5d8-818e-4741-9533-259d0fc0e16d  rack1
>
> root@cassandra-2:~# nodetool describecluster
> Cluster Information:
>     Name: sa-cassandra
>     Snitch: org.apache.cassandra.locator.DynamicEndpointSnitch
>     Partitioner: org.apache.cassandra.dht.Murmur3Partitioner
>     Schema versions:
>         e2275d0f-a5fc-39d9-8f11-268b5e9dc295: [10.42.209.245]
>
>         5f5f66f5-d6aa-3b90-b674-e08811d4d412: [10.42.247.173]
>
> Freshly bootstrapped node - 10.42.247.173
> Single node from original cluster - 10.42.209.245
>
> I read https://docs.datastax.com/en/dse-trblshoot/doc/troubles
> hooting/schemaDisagree.html and tried restarting the new node but it
> didnt help.
>
> Please do suggest. We are facing this issue in production.
>
> Thank you.
>

-- 


--



Reply via email to