Latest DSE is based on 3.11 (possibly due to CASSANDRA-12269, but just a guess).
For us (only), none of 3.0+/3.11+ qualifies for production to be honest, when
you are familiar with having 2.1 in production.
· 3.0 needs more hardware resources to handle the same load =>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12269. Improved (close/back to
2.1 level) in 3.11
· With 3.11.0 we are seeing the following memory leak (at least here,
but possibly nobody else out there, cause the ticket gets close to zero
attention *g*): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13929
· From an operational perspective, the repair area got much more
troublesome compared to 2.1 when introducing incremental repairs being the
default in 2.2+
We stay on 2.1 for now.
Just my opinion.
From: Herbert Fischer [mailto:herbert.fisc...@crossengage.io]
Sent: Dienstag, 07. November 2017 14:35
Subject: Re: Stable Cassandra 3.x version for production
I know that people usually prefers to use the 3.0.x branch because that's the
one that is underneath DSE.
I've never heard of anyone using Cassandra > 3.0.x on production.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, shini gupta
Which version of Cassandra 3.x is stable and production-ready?
Herbert Fischer | Senior IT Architect
CrossEngage GmbH | Bertha-Benz Straße 5 | 10557 Berlin
Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg | HRB 169537 B
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Markus Wübben, Manuel Hinz | USt-IdNr.: DE301504202
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It
contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named
addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it
to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and
then destroy it. Dynatrace Austria GmbH (registration number FN 91482h) is a
company registered in Linz whose registered office is at 4040 Linz, Austria,