when we replace node, we can dynamically reassign the IPs to the new node, 
reducing downtime. But we are not sure about the performance in terms of 
latency, throughput etc (we are heavy on reads).
    On Sunday, November 12, 2017, 2:03:14 PM PST, Jeff Jirsa <jji...@gmail.com> 
 Any reason you think EFS would be better than EBS?

-- Jeff Jirsa

On Nov 12, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Subroto Barua <sbarua...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:

We have a unique requirement to replace C* (3.0.x on RHEL) nodeswith a new AWS 
AMI image periodically. The current process (add node/decommissionetc) is a 
very manual and time consuming process. We currently use EBS andexploring EFS 
as an option to speed up the process.
Does anybody have any experience running C* on EFS storage?Any 
comments/pros/cons going with this combination in Prod?



Reply via email to