To provide more context, I was going through this
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Akash Gangil <akashg1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering if there are recommendations around the cardinality of
> secondary indexes.
> As I understand an index on a column with many distinct values will be
> inefficient. Is it because the index would only direct me to the specfic
> sstable, but then it sequentially searches for the target records? So a
> wide range of the index could lead to a lot of ssltable options to traverse?
> Though what's unclear is what the recommended (or benchmarked?) limit, is
> it the index must have 100 distinct values, or can it have upto 1000 or
> 50000 distinct values?