In that case, are there any well defined ways on how to do downsampling of
data in C*?
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Valentina Crisan <
> as far as I know it is not intended for MV's to have a different TTL than
> the base tables. There was patch released at some point to not allow TTL
> setting on MV (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12868).
> MV's should inherit the TTL of the base table.
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:42 PM, Akash Gangil <akashg1...@gmail.com>
>> I had a couple of questions:
>> 1. Can I create a materialized view on a table with a TTL longer than the
>> base table? For ex: my materialized view TTL is 1 month while my base table
>> TTL is 1 week.
>> 2. In the above scenario, since the data in my base table would be gone
>> after a week, would it impact data in the materialized view?
>> My use case if I have some time series data, which is stored in the base
>> table by_minute and I want to downsample it to by_month. So my base table
>> stores by_minute data but my materialized view stores stores by_week data.