Docker will provide less per node overhead. And yes, virtualizing smaller nodes out of a bigger physical makes sense. Of course you lose the per node failure protection, but I guess this is not production?
<======> "Who do you think made the first stone spear? The Asperger guy. If you get rid of the autism genetics, there would be no Silicon Valley" Temple Grandin *Daemeon C.M. ReiydelleSan Francisco 1.415.501.0198London 44 020 8144 9872* On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:26 PM, onmstester onmstester <onmstes...@zoho.com> wrote: > What i've got to set up my Apache Cassandra cluster are some Servers with > 20 Core cpu * 2 Threads and 128 GB ram and 8 * 2TB disk. > Just read all over the web: Do not use big nodes for your cluster, i'm > convinced to run multiple nodes on a single physical server. > So the question is which technology should i use: Docker or Virtualiztion > (ESX)? Any exprience? > > Sent using Zoho Mail > > > >
