In 3.x+ the format on disk is the same with compact storage on or off so you shouldn't expect much of a difference in table size with the new storage format compared to compact vs non compact in 2.x.
Chris > On Jan 22, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Nitan Kainth <nitankai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hey Chris, > > We upgraded form 3.0.4 to 3.11. yes, I did run upgradesstables -a to migrate > sstables. > Here is the table structure: > > CREATE TABLE ks.cf1 ( > key text, > column1 timestamp, > value blob, > PRIMARY KEY (key, column1) > ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE > > CREATE TABLE ks.cf2 ( > key bigint, > column1 text, > value blob, > PRIMARY KEY (key, column1) > ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE > > CREATE TABLE ks.cf3 ( > key text, > column1 timestamp, > value int, > PRIMARY KEY (key, column1) > ) WITH COMPACT STORAGE > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:07 AM Chris Lohfink <clohf...@apple.com.invalid> > wrote: > What version are you running? Did you include an upgradesstables -a or > something to rebuild without the compact storage in your migration? > > After 3.0 the new format can be more or less the same size as the 2.x compact > storage tables depending on schema (which can impact things a lot). > > Chris > > > On Jan 22, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Nitan Kainth <nitankai...@gmail.com > > <mailto:nitankai...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We are testing to migrate off from compact storage. After removing compact > > storage, we were hoping to see an increase in disk usage but nothing > > changed. > > any feedback, why didn't we see an increase in storage? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org > <mailto:user-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@cassandra.apache.org > <mailto:user-h...@cassandra.apache.org> >
