Henk, see my comments inline.
Henk van Voorthuijsen schrieb: > > On Aug 15, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Ralf Joachim wrote: > >> Personaly I don't think that introduction of a <fieldset> element is >> neccessary, instead we may omit the <map-to> element. If the <map-to> >> element is omited the <class> may be treated like your suggested >> <fieldset>. Having said that I didn't check if this is possible yet. > > > Interesting idea. Does this mean that extending a class without <map- > to> element would evaluete to fields in the extending class? That's exactly what I thought. But still it is only an idea. > >> >> If you like to continue this discussion i suggest to open an issue in >> jira as an enhancement request. You may also connect to >> irc://irc.codehaus.org/castor to share your ideas. > > > OK, I'll try that. Thanks for the Info! You are always welcome. > > Henk > > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message > to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- -- Syscon Ingenieurbüro für Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH Ralf Joachim Raiffeisenstraße 11 D-72127 Kusterdingen Germany Tel. +49 7071 3690 52 Mobil: +49 173 9630135 Fax +49 7071 3690 98 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.syscon-world.de ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
