Jitesh-
I've been looking at your problem on and off recently, and I agree that
unmarhsalling behaves well without validation. Unfortunately, I get
"General Schema Error: Grammar with uri 2: http://castor.exolab.org/ ,
can not found." instead of the mapping error you're getting. I've
attempted changing all references from exolab.org to codehaus.org, but I
get the same error (just checking if the parser is attempting to contact
the URL for some reason).
If you know how to get around this problem, I'll attempt to further test
the situation.
Thanks,
Stephen
Kalyani Jitesh wrote:
HI Gregory,
Thanks for your mail. Yes I posting the same again and again to get some
help.
Actually all mapping is working fine without schema validation. But when
I set following properties for validation, it is throwing this error.
But I am not able to find it out.
org.exolab.castor.parser.validation=true
org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true
org.exolab.castor.sax.features=http://xml.org/sax/features/validation,http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema,http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema-full-checking
Thanks And Regards,
Jitesh
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Block" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML][Mapping] Error: unable to find
FieldDescriptor when validation on
I've seen this post several times, and have noticed that nobody else
seems to be saying anything...
On 18 Aug 2005, at 09:02, Kalyani Jitesh wrote:
<field name="loggerList" collection="map" get-method="getLoggerList"
set-method="addLogger" type="TMLogger">
First point: I'm not familiar with maps, so I don't know if that
will have an impact. I wasn't of the opinion that they could be used
this way - someone will have to clarify.
<bind-xml name="logger" location="logging"/>
Second: Not sure if that's enough to just say logging - thought you
wanted logging/logger here. Don't know if you've already examined
that, however.
<class name="TMLogger">
<field name="name" type="string">
<bind-xml name="name" node="attribute"/>
</field>
<field name="boundryLevel" type="string">
<bind-xml name="boundrylevel" node="attribute"/>
</field>
</class>
</mapping>
And again, I have no idea how this would ever be mapped to a name/
value pair on map. Don't you really want a List-based collection,
rather than a map, for this?
Anyways, someone more familiar with the XML side will need to answer
those questions for you. I imagine your first problem is in
incorrect use of the location attribute, and maybe that will solve
your problems - I honestly don't know. The use of a map seems odd,
to me, but who knows - maybe that's what's intended.
Best of luck.
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty
message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message
to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
