Hi Charles,

from 0.9.7 to 0.9.9 nothing changed at the OQL syntax but we had to
change the generation of the SQL statements according to the
introduction of polymorphism. Especially the generated SQL for classes
that take part in an extend declaration of the mapping have changed
significantly. Even if this should be hidden from castor users it will
hit you when you use CALL SQL ... AS ... statements.

Having said that it may be possible that you recognized a bug where we
generate wrong SQL in a usecase not covered by or test framework at the
moment. I am quite interested to get more information about that
problem, like full stacktrace, mapping, failing sql statement. Much
better then only informations would be a testcase to reproduce the
problem ourself ;-)

Regards
Ralf


Charles Read schrieb:
> I substituted castor-0.9.9.jar for castor-0.9.7.jar,
> rebuilt my webapp and then redeployed it.
>  
> Mostly, everything worked ok.  However, at some
> point I got a PersistenceException (that in turn was
> triggered by an SQLException).  The exception message
> says that "You have an error in your SQL syntax; ..."
>  
> I am using MySQL 4.1.  The webapp works fine
> with castor-0.9.7.jar.
>  
> Question:  has OQL changed in castor-0.9.9.jar?
>  
> NOTE:  I looked at the docs for OQL on castor.org,
> but found no reference to OQL changes for 0.9.9.
>  
> Thanks.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! for Good
> Click here to donate <http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/> to the
> Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

-- 

Syscon Ingenieurbüro für
Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH
Ralf Joachim
Raiffeisenstraße 11
D-72127 Kusterdingen
Germany

Tel.   +49 7071 3690 52
Mobil: +49 173 9630135
Fax    +49 7071 3690 98

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:   www.syscon-world.de

-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please 
send an empty message to the following address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to