I have found something close @
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-447 bugzillaid=1306
And I know this affects versions 0.9.7 and 0.9.9
I think the comment posted by Drew Cox on May 05, 2005 addresses my
current issue.
The following is from the schema:
<xsd:complexType name="C-14">
<xsd:simpleContent>
<xsd:extension base="C-14_NoID">
<xsd:attribute name="id" type="ID"/>
</xsd:extension>
</xsd:simpleContent>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:simpleType name="C-14_NoID">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:maxLength value="14"/>
<xsd:minLength value="1"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
Thank you for your help.
- Danny
On 10/19/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danny,
>
> can you please search for a Jira issue at
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR to see whether somebody else reported
> a similar (if not the same) problem.
>
> Thanks
> Werner
>
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:00:15 -0400, Danny Collins wrote:
>
> >I was looking around the castor site and I couldn't find anything to
> >tell me why the validation changed after 0.9.6. Any body have a clue?
> >
> >On 10/14/05, Danny Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OK - here is something a little bizarre.
> >>
> >> 0.9.6 generates code in the descriptor class that has maxlength validation
> >>
> >> 0.9.7 and 0.9.9 do not. I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I am now
> >> missing something in my build file or my castor properties to get the
> >> same behavior out of the later releases.
> >>
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >>
> >> On 10/14/05, Danny Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > that's what I thought! and I am using the SourceGenerator.
> >> >
> >> > OK - I think this may be part of my problem - here is a snippet of the
> >> > schema
> >> >
> >> > <xsd:complexType name="C-14">
> >> > <xsd:simpleContent>
> >> > <xsd:extension base="C-14_NoID">
> >> > <xsd:attribute name="id" type="ID"/>
> >> > </xsd:extension>
> >> > </xsd:simpleContent>
> >> > </xsd:complexType>
> >> > <xsd:simpleType name="C-14_NoID">
> >> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
> >> > <xsd:maxLength value="14"/>
> >> > <xsd:minLength value="1"/>
> >> > </xsd:restriction>
> >> > </xsd:simpleType>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I am trying to get the C-14 type to validate, except the restriction
> >> > is on the C-14_NoID node, and when I look at the Descriptor class the
> >> > getExtends is always null. Which is why I think that I'm not getting
> >> > the validation I think I should be getting.
> >> >
> >> > No objects are generated that have anything to do with C-14_NoID.
> >> >
> >> > Do I need to let the sourcegenerator know anything special to get it
> >> > to generate the extended nodes?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks again for the help!
> >> > Danny
> >> >
> >> > On 10/13/05, Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Danny,
> >> > >
> >> > > Castor will, by default, validate the object model prior to the
> >> > > marshalling process. If you're using the source generator then the
> >> > > generated descriptors contain some validation attributes that Castor
> >> > > will use during this validation process. If you're not using the source
> >> > > generator you'd have to create your own validators or validation step.
> >> > >
> >> > > Castor's object model validation is not as "complete" as validating the
> >> > > XML itself with the parser, but it should provide you with the basic
> >> > > property level validation, so in your situation the strings that are
> >> > > too
> >> > > long should be validated by Castor's object model validation process.
> >> > >
> >> > > If you open up the *Descriptor.java files you'll see the validation
> >> > > code
> >> > > to give you an idea of what Castor will validate against.
> >> > >
> >> > > --Keith
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Danny Collins wrote:
> >> > > > AHA! Yeah I am trying to go from Java->XML and get the same level of
> >> > > > validation that you would get when you go form XML->JAVA.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > We are already exploring adding in our own validation step. I was
> >> > > > just
> >> > > > hoping to leverage anything that castor provided.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > thanks
> >> > > > Danny
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 10/13/05, Stephen Bash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >>Danny-
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>Are you validating during xml->java or java->xml? The properties
> >> > > >>given
> >> > > >>tell the xml parser to validate against a given schema, but during
> >> > > >>java->xml, I don't believe the parser is utilized (there might be an
> >> > > >>option that I don't know about). My first idea would be to generate
> >> > > >>the
> >> > > >>xml from the java objects, and then run that xml through a validating
> >> > > >>parser to determine if the xml conforms to the schema.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>I should mention that I don't use the source generator much at all,
> >> > > >>so
> >> > > >>there may be options in there to help with validation that I don't
> >> > > >>know
> >> > > >>about.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>Stephen
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>Danny Collins wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>>OK - popped those attributes into my properties file - regenerated
> >> > > >>>the
> >> > > >>>source code and the fed the objects a ton of invalid data - mainly
> >> > > >>>strings that are WAY too long and should fail validation and will
> >> > > >>>if I
> >> > > >>>do
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>I've attached my castor properties file.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>I am trying to validate an individual object in the castor graph -
> >> > > >>>that is a piece of the schema.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>do I need to build out the entire object graph in order for it to
> >> > > >>>validate correctly?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>Thanks again, you all are being very helpful!
> >> > > >>>Danny
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>On 10/13/05, Danny Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>>SWEET! Thanks for pointing this out. I am going to give it a go
> >> > > >>>>straight away and let you know if it works out for me!
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>Thanks again guys.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>On 10/13/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>>Yes, as recently added to the XML F.A.Q. (though not released
> >> > > >>>>>yet):
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>><p>To enable XML validation at the parser level, please add
> >> > > >>>>>properties
> >> > > >>>>>to your
> >> > > >>>>><tt>castor.properties</tt> file as follows:</p>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>><code>
> >> > > >>>>> org.exolab.castor.parser.namespaces=true
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>org.exolab.castor.sax.features=http://xml.org/sax/features/validation,\
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema,\
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>http://apache.org/xml/features/validation/schema-full-checking
> >> > > >>>>></code>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>><p>Please note that the example given relies on the use of Apache
> >> > > >>>>>Xerces, hence the
> >> > > >>>>><tt>apache.org</tt> properties; similar options should exist for
> >> > > >>>>>other
> >> > > >>>>>parsers.</p>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>I hope this helps
> >> > > >>>>>Werner
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >>>>>wg> From: Danny Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 3:49 PM
> >> > > >>>>>wg> To: [email protected]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Schema Validation
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> My original thought was that a call to validate prior to
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Marshal would work. But that doesn't seem to do anything.
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Then I found a reference to a property in the
> >> > > >>>>>wg> castor.properties file called
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> org.exolab.castor.marshalling.validation
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> that I have tried with true and false to no avail.
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Any thing else that I should know about?
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> TIA
> >> > > >>>>>wg> Danny
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> On 10/13/05, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > Danny,
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > No, you are not. How are you instructing the XML parser
> >> > > >>>>>wg> (via Castor)
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > to use XML Schema validation ?
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > Werner
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> From: Danny Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 1:35 PM
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> To: [email protected]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> Subject: [castor-user] Schema Validation
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> Hello,
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> I seem to be having problems getting the my objects
> >> > > >>>>>validated
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> against the schema - it seems to be able to tell me if
> >> > > >>>>>I am
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> missing required objects, but it doesn't seem to be
> >> > > >>>>>able to
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> validate other restrictions like maxlength. Am I
> >> > > >>>>>wg> misinterpreting
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> the validation abilities?
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> TIA
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> Danny
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > >>>>>wg> send an empty
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> message to the following address:
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg> -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an
> >> > > >>>>>empty
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > message to the following address:
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg> >
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an
> >> > > >>>>>wg> empty message to the following address:
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>wg> -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>wg>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > >>>>>send an empty message to the following address:
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>>>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > >>>send an empty message to the following address:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > >>send an empty message to the following address:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > >>-------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > > send an empty message to the following address:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> > > send an empty message to the following address:
> >> > >
> >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > > -------------------------------------------------
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------
> >> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >> send an empty message to the following address:
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> -------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------
> >If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> >send an empty message to the following address:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >-------------------------------------------------
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
> send an empty message to the following address:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------
