Hi Shiva, I'm sorry but this is not possible with castor at the moment. You need to find a workaround on your java objects for this to work.
Regards Ralf Shiva P. Kodityala schrieb: > I have an not-normalized table which is already existing. > > tableX(col1, col2, col3,col4,col5,col6) > > For every (col1, col2, col3), there are number of(col4,col5,col6). Can I have > a classA mapping to first part and classB mapping to second part and have a > relation 1:m? - Is it possible? If so, do I have to take any precautions? If > not, what is the better approach? Of course, I am not authorized to change > the design of existing table. So, Both the classes point to the same table. > Ultimately, I want to get normalized data into my java objects without extra > processing. > > Thanks for help. > > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please > send an empty message to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
