Based upon this little discussion, is anybody willing to come up with an initial patch (specific to Castor JDO initially, if possible) ? That patch should take care of the following tasks:
* identify the contract (if required at all); iow, define a way that users can instruct Castor to access private getter/setters. This could be either a configuration option via castor.properties, or be in form of an amendment to the mapping file. * identify the main areas of change (iow, include some meaningful (though minimal) documentation. * make the necessary changes in for of a unified patch. Having said that, I think that I'd like to see a initial contribution from somebody else than me and/or Ralf ... ;-). l4l Werner Gregory Block wrote: > > On 25 Jan 2006, at 20:08, Jay Goldman wrote: > >> IMHO this gives castor license to cross the public/private 'barrier' >> when the user of castor has asked for this behavior (i.e., via >> direct="true") just as java serialization allows for the setting of >> private data. > > > *cheer* > > 150% behind you. :) > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message > to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
