Hi werner,

I have created and tested the test case (bug1330) but I am having some
problems to make the unified patch. The "cvs diff  -u" command compares the
server repository against my local copy and does not take into account the
new brach (bug1330) that I have created for the bug report (copy of the
template).

I have tried the "-N" parameter that should take those new directories into
consideration but it does not work (we have seen that th "-N" option only
works in some versions of cvs)

Do you have any suggestion of how can I do this?

Thanks
                                    
 CEIN, S.A.                         
                                    
 Raúl Sanz de Acedo Pérez           
                                    
 Técnico Sénior - Dpto. Innovación  
 Empresarial                        
                                    
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                      
                                    
 Polígono Mocholí - Plaza Cein,     
 31110 Noáin                        
                                    





                                                                                
                                                        
                      "Werner Guttmann"                                         
                                                        
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]      Para:     
<[email protected]>                                                     
                      in.com>                  cc:                              
                                                        
                                               Asunto:   RE: [castor-user] 
problem deleting dependant objects                           
                      22/02/2006 16:40                                          
                                                        
                      Por favor, responda                                       
                                                        
                      a user                                                    
                                                        
                                                                                
                                                        
                                                                                
                                                        




Gracias.

Werner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 16:30
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [castor-user] problem deleting dependant objects
>
>
> All right, I am on it
>
>  CEIN, S.A.
>
>  Raúl Sanz de Acedo Pérez
>
>  Técnico Sénior - Dpto. Innovación
>  Empresarial
>
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>  Polígono Mocholí - Plaza Cein,
>  31110 Noáin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>                       "Werner Guttmann"
>
>
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]      Para:
> <[email protected]>
>
>                       in.com>                  cc:
>
>
>                                                Asunto:   RE:
> [castor-user] problem deleting dependant objects
>
>                       22/02/2006 11:06
>
>
>                       Por favor, responda
>
>
>                       a user
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Raul,
>
> I just wanted you to attach a working sample I could use to
> analyse your problem, iow everything needed to replay your
> scenario: entities, mapping files, SQL script, etc. Now, if
> you attached all this as a unified patch (as explained at
> http://castor.org/how-to-submit-a-bug.html) relatively to
> src/bugs, this would be of great help to me.
>
> Werner
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 10:56
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [castor-user] problem deleting dependant objects
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have created the issue at jira: CASTOR-1330. But I don't
> know what
> > you mean by "bug report".
> >
> >  CEIN, S.A.
> >
> >  Raúl Sanz de Acedo Pérez
> >
> >  Técnico Sénior - Dpto. Innovación
> >  Empresarial
> >
> >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >  Polígono Mocholí - Plaza Cein,
> >  31110 Noáin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                       "Werner Guttmann"
> >
> >
> >                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]      Para:
> > <[email protected]>
> >
> >                       in.com>                  cc:
> >
> >
> >                                                Asunto:   RE:
> > [castor-user] problem deleting dependant objects
> >
> >                       22/02/2006 10:43
> >
> >
> >                       Por favor, responda
> >
> >
> >                       a user
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Raul,
> >
> > Can I please (again) ask you to open a Jira issue at
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR, and attach a bug report (if
> > possible). I'll make sure this wil be taken care of in due time ...
> >
> > Regards
> > Werner
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Mittwoch, 22. Februar 2006 10:30
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [castor-user] problem deleting dependant objects
> > >
> > > Helo,
> > >
> > > We have found another problem with castor 1.0M2 that did
> > not occur in
> > > previous versions (at least in 0.9.5). Let me explain an example:
> > >
> > > Imagine we have two tables in a database such as those
> that follow:
> > >
> > > CREATE TABLE TABLEPARENT (
> > >       IdParent   NUMBER(38)   NOT NULL);
> > >
> > > ALTER TABLE TABLEPARENT ADD (
> > >       CONSTRAINT PK_TABLEPARENT PRIMARY KEY (IdParent);
> > >
> > > CREATE TABLE TABLECHILD (
> > >       IdChild   NUMBER(38)   NOT NULL,
> > >       IdParent   NUMBER(38)   NOT NULL);
> > >
> > > ALTER TABLE TABLECHILD ADD (
> > >       CONSTRAINT PK_TABLECHILD  PRIMARY KEY (IdChild);
> > >
> > > ALTER TABLE TABLECHILD ADD (
> > >       CONSTRAINT FK_TABLECHILD FOREIGN KEY (IdParent ) REFERENCES
> > > TABLEPARENT (IdParent));
> > >
> > > Where the records from "TABLECHILD" as shown above depend
> > on the table
> > > "TABLEPARENT" by the primary key of the parent "IdParent".
> > >
> > > These are translated into two models where "ChildModel" and
> > > "ParentModel"
> > > are related by a member variable of "ChildModel", let's call it
> > > "IdParent".
> > > Therefore, "ParentModel" do not have any references of its
> > child. The
> > > child know who is its father by its member variable, "IdParent".
> > >
> > > Imagine, now, that we want to delete a record "oParentModel"
> > > from "TABLEPARENT", we must, first, delete its child from
> > > "TABLECHILD". Let's say this parent only has one children,
> > > "oChildModel".
> > >
> > > Therefore, in the code, we do something like this (in the order
> > > shown):
> > >
> > > JDOManager.getDatabase().remove(oChildModel);
> > > JDOManager.getDatabase().remove(oParentModel);
> > >
> > > So first, castor is told to remove the child record and
> > afterwards the
> > > parent one. If not, the database would throw a "child
> record found"
> > > and will not allow us to delete the two models.
> > >
> > > The problem is that castor does not seem to delete the
> > models in the
> > > order we tell it to do it. It seems, castor deletes them in
> > a random
> > > order because sometimes it throws a SQLException and the
> > next try not.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advanced,
> > >
> > > P.S.: Sorry, this time I have not spent time checking the
> code so I
> > > can tell you exactly what it is happening, I could not find time.
> > >
> > >  CEIN, S.A.
> > >
> > >  Raúl Sanz de Acedo Pérez
> > >
> > >  Técnico Sénior - Dpto. Innovación
> > >  Empresarial
> > >
> > >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >  Polígono Mocholí - Plaza Cein,
> > >  31110 Noáin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty
> > > message to the following address:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty
> > message to the following address:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty
> > message to the following address:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an
> empty message to the following address:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an
> empty message to the following address:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------







-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
send an empty message to the following address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to