Barbara,

as it seams you need a urgent solution. I would suggest to not use
groups then. I don't think that using a mapping will help. One
possibility may be to search jira (castor's bugtracking) if someone else
reported similar issues. If there is none you should create a new one.
We would also appreciate if you could attach a test case that enables us
to replay the problem, most offen the only way to fix a issue as you may
know yourself.

Regards
Ralf


Barbara Prechtl schrieb:
> Stephen:
> 
> Unfortunately, I still can not see what is wrong, other than stepping to
> the line of code and seeing that there is a problem in the castor code
> where is dereferencing a null object. I need to get something working
> for Monday morning... Unless there is a fix for using groups, my only
> solution may be to not use groups in schemas.
> 
> Will a mapping file help with this problem. If so I was also having some
> trouble with the mapping tool:
> 
> Mapping class: com.nortel.schema.code.Data.sceStatistics.SceStatistics
> Mapping file:
> D:\Workspaces\eclipse311\SCESchemaCode/schema/Maps/sceStatisticsMap.xml
> org.exolab.castor.mapping.MappingException: Nested error:
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>       at
> org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller.processAttribute(Marshaller.java:2320)
>       at
> org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller.marshal(Marshaller.java:1323)
>       at
> org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller.marshal(Marshaller.java:1824)
>       at org.exolab.castor.xml.Marshaller.marshal(Marshaller.java:821)
>       at
> org.exolab.castor.tools.MappingTool.write(MappingTool.java:478)
>       at
> com.nortel.sce.Map.MappingCreator.createMap(MappingCreator.java:68)
>       at
> com.nortel.sce.Map.CreateClassMaps.createMappingFiles(CreateClassMaps.ja
> va:46)
>       at
> com.nortel.sce.Map.CreateClassMaps.main(CreateClassMaps.java:88)
> 
> Barbara
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Bash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 1:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [castor-user] mapping and binding
> 
> Barbara-
> 
> I came to the same conclusion about the NPE.  Because you are using
> the SourceGenerator, the descriptors referenced in the code snippet
> you quoted are actually Java code that you can open up and look at,
> which may or may not be helpful.
> 
> What you're actually interested in is the FieldDescriptor, but you
> might be able to find that based on the ClassDescriptor (just follow
> the method calls) -- I think Castor names the classes in a fairly
> obvious way, so something like NodeTypeClassDescriptor or
> DescriptionGroupFieldDescriptor would be a good place to start
> looking.  If you open the FieldDescriptor (whatever it ends up being
> named) and check what its getFieldType method is doing, that might
> give some hint to what is happening.  Unfortunately we're rapidly
> crossing into code I know nothing about...  If getFieldType simply
> returns null, that comes from the SourceGenerator, and I'm not much
> help telling you why it wrote that, but maybe someone else can.
> 
> Let me know what you find.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> On 3/3/06, Barbara Prechtl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>Stephen:
>>
>>I tried the generateImportedSchema to true and it still did not work.
> 
> I
> 
>>sent you the place in the unmarshaller where it is failing. Please let
>>me know if you still want me to put together an example.... cause I
>>will, I just have lots of other unrelated stuff in the schema that is
>>not necessary to send.
>>
>>Barbara
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Stephen Bash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 12:39 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [castor-user] mapping and binding
>>
>>Barbara-
>>
>>What version of Castor are you using?  I don't know much about the
>>SourceGeneration side, but with the correct version of Castor I might
>>be able to look at the stack trace and figure out what is happening.
>>Next question, can you produce the XML snippet you mentioned from
>>marshalling?  I'll try to look into it and see if I can glean any
>>information from the stack trace.
>>
>>Stephen
>>
>>
>>On 3/3/06, Barbara Prechtl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Stephan:
>>>
>>>Thanks for your help. I did get the Java objects to marshall without
>>
>>the
>>
>>>use of a mapping file.
>>>
>>>I am now having problems with the unmarshalling of documents that
> 
> use
> 
>>>elements that are of a group type. For instance I have defined in my
>>>schema a description group as follows:
>>>
>>>        <xsd:group name="DescriptionGroup">
>>>                <xsd:sequence>
>>>                        <xsd:element name="description"
>>>type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
>>>                </xsd:sequence>
>>>        </xsd:group>
>>>
>>>This is used in my NodeType definition:
>>>
>>><xsd:complexType name="NodeType">
>>>                <xsd:sequence>
>>>                        <xsd:group
>>>ref="shr:DescriptionGroup"></xsd:group>
>>>                </xsd:sequence>
>>></xsd:complexType>
>>>
>>>
>>>When in my instance document I have the description the
> 
> unmarshalling
> 
>>>throws an exception.
>>>
>>><node>
>>>        <description> comment </description>
>>></node>
>>>
>>>When I create the classes with the source generator I use the
>>
>>following
>>
>>>flags:
>>>
>>>generateMappingFiles=true
>>>createMarshalMethods=true
>>>GenerateImportedSchemas=false
>>>Validation=true
>>>
>>>I am getting an error every time I try to use the description
> 
> element
> 
>>in
>>
>>>a document. I have noticed that this happens with other group types.
>>>Does group unmarshalling work?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Barbara
>>>
>>>The error I get is as follows:
>>>
>>>Error occurred in read. Target Exception is::
>>>org.exolab.castor.xml.MarshalException : null
>>>null{file: [not available]; line: 64; column: 18}
>>>        at
>>>org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.unmarshal(Unmarshaller.java:669)
>>>        at
>>>org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.unmarshal(Unmarshaller.java:563)
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> com.nortel.sce.xml.utils.XmlToJava.readXMLinstanceToObject(XmlToJava.jav
> 
>>>a:143)
>>>        at
>>>com.nortel.sce.xml.utils.XmlUtils.unmarshallXML(XmlUtils.java:89)
>>>        at
>>>com.nortel.sce.model.ContainerData.read(ContainerData.java:109)
>>>        at
>>>com.nortel.sce.model.ContainerData.<init>(ContainerData.java:52)
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> com.nortel.sce.model.ApplicationData.getContainerByName(ApplicationData.
> 
>>>java:135)
>>>        at com.nortel.sce.model.ModelData.main(ModelData.java:273)
>>>Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> org.exolab.castor.xml.UnmarshalHandler.startElement(UnmarshalHandler.jav
> 
>>>a:1994)
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> org.exolab.castor.xml.UnmarshalHandler.startElement(UnmarshalHandler.jav
> 
>>>a:1375)
>>>        at
>>>
> 
> org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser.startElement(SAXParser.java:1376)
> 
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> org.apache.xerces.validators.common.XMLValidator.callStartElement(XMLVal
> 
>>>idator.java:1214)
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLDocumentScanner$ContentDispatcher.dispatc
> 
>>>h(XMLDocumentScanner.java:1171)
>>>        at
>>>
>>
> org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLDocumentScanner.parseSome(XMLDocumentScan
> 
>>>ner.java:381)
>>>        at
>>>org.apache.xerces.framework.XMLParser.parse(XMLParser.java:1081)
>>>        at
>>>org.exolab.castor.xml.Unmarshaller.unmarshal(Unmarshaller.java:655)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Stephen Bash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 8:30 AM
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: [castor-user] mapping and binding
>>>
>>>Barbara-
>>>
>>>I'm not much of an expert on the binding-file side, but I use
> 
> mapping
> 
>>>files all the time.  The short answer is no, you don't need both,
> 
> but
> 
>>>yes, they both describe Java object <-> XML relations.
>>>
>>>In general, I believe, the binding file is used to create Java code
>>>(that can then be compiled and used in an application) from an XML
>>>Schema.  The binding file is most often (only?) used with the Castor
>>>SourceGenerator, which creates Java classes that model an XML
> 
> schema,
> 
>>>at which point Castor also creates extra classes (ClassDescriptors
> 
> and
> 
>>>FieldDescriptors) that describe how the Java objects "map" to XML.
>>>
>>>The mapping file provides an alternate method for the user to
> 
> specify
> 
>>>how Java objects transform into XML content.  I tend to think of
> 
> this
> 
>>>as how one starts with a Java object model and then creates the XML
>>>structure from it, but it is much more flexible than that.
>>>
>>>Where the two methods somewhat meet is the
>>>ClassDescriptor/FieldDescriptor level.  When a user loads a mapping,
>>>Castor reads the mapping file and internally creates the appropriate
>>>descriptors.  If the SourceGenerator was used, the descriptors exist
>>>as compiled classes and are instantiated as they are needed (thus
> 
> the
> 
>>>mapping file usually isn't required).
>>>
>>>That might be more information than you needed, but hopefully it
>>>answers the question.  Let us know if you have further questions.
>>>
>>>Stephen
>>>
>>>On 3/3/06, Barbara Prechtl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>To whom it may concern:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I was wondering what the difference between a mapping file and a
>>>
>>>binding
>>>
>>>>file is.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Is this correct:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>A mapping file is used for writing java objects to xml.
>>>>
>>>>A binding file is used to read xml to java objects.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They both seem to describe the element to object relation. Are
> 
> both
> 
>>>needed?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>Barbara
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------
>>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
>>>send an empty message to the following address:
>>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>-------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------
>>If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please
>>send an empty message to the following address:
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>-------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please 
> send an empty message to the following address:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -------------------------------------------------

-- 

Syscon Ingenieurbüro für
Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH
Ralf Joachim
Raiffeisenstraße 11
D-72127 Kusterdingen
Germany

Tel.   +49 7071 3690 52
Mobil: +49 173 9630135
Fax    +49 7071 3690 98

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web:   www.syscon-world.de

-------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please 
send an empty message to the following address:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to