Hi,
This is not really castor concerned - sorry about that. I have a case with cyclic dependencies in complex types definitions. Castor works fine - returns correct type, but this enters my code in endless loop and I needed a lot of time to catch the problem.
However - is this schema legal? Is it allowed to have cyclic dependencies in types?
In fact if minOccurs = 0 this is not really a problem for xml defined by schema. But there are cases in which schema defines impossible xml.
10x in advance,
Stoil
- [castor-user] cyclic dependencies in types definition stoil valchkov
- Re: [castor-user] cyclic dependencies in types definit... Keith Visco
- Re: [castor-user] cyclic dependencies in types def... stoil valchkov

