For those of you not being natively English, have a look at http://www.thefreedictionary.com/guys
Where it (to my own surprise) it is stated that 'guys' really can be used in the sense as descibed by Keith. Guy, noun 1. Informal A man; a fellow. 2. guys Informal *** Persons of either sex. *** 3. Chiefly British A person of odd or grotesque appearance or dress. And I thought for a second that Keith is making up a story ... ;-) Werner > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Freitag, 24. März 2006 07:44 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [castor-user] When unmarshalling, need Castor to > validate entire document against schema instead of quitting > after first validation error > > > Oops. I just got a private e-mail from an observant member > pointing out my lack of attention to detail. Just to be > clear, I used the term "guys" > in a strictly generic way which included both genders. I > should be more careful to use gender-non-specific terms when > addressing more than one person. My apologies to the female audience. > > --Keith > > Keith Visco wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > Take a look at ValidationContext and ValidationException. I already > > started the groundwork for this. You'll see that > ValidationException > > already supports chaining and ValidationContext has a > fail-fast flag. > > Unfortunately, disabling fail-fast has not yet been > implemented, but > > it was definately on my to-do list. I don't think it would be that > > difficult to implement for the Marshaller...but doing so in a "safe" > > manner during unmarshalling may be a bit more challenging. > > > > --Keith > > > > Werner Guttmann wrote: > > > >> Stephen, Patty > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Stephen Bash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: > Donnerstag, 23. > >>> März 2006 14:45 > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [castor-user] When unmarshalling, need Castor to > >>> validate entire document against schema instead of quitting after > >>> first validation error > >>> > >>> Patty- > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, I don't think you can replace the ErrorHandler in > >>> such a way that the change will stick. When you call > unmarshal, the > >>> Unmarshaller sets the error handler just before starting > parsing. > >>> So that means the fix needs to live inside Castor, unless > we create > >>> a method for user-supplied ErrorHandlers. > >> > >> > >> If we decide to do so, why not a similar mechanism to DTDResolver, > >> which allows some sort of chaining. > >> > >> Werner > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------- > >> If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty > >> message to the following address: > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty > > message to the following address: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an > empty message to the following address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
