> Keith said... >> It's probably not the best solution, but you can use the >> getFieldDescriptor() method of AbstractFieldHandler (GeneralizedFieldHandler) >> to find out about the which field is being processed and you can do the >> proper padding as necessary.
This sounds OK to me. You could just subclass it and have it look to singleton object you configure with settings on a field by field basis. There is supposed to be a way to have a FieldHandlerFactory use a class you specify by default. I have not tried it. > Steven said... >> I also have to do a FieldHandler to wrap all of the elements in CDATA[] tags. Did you actually get this to work? From reading the other posts about this it sounds like the < at the start will be escaped. Not true? Chris Elvart AT&T ------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please send an empty message to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------
