> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kuns, Edward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:44 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [castor-user] Does Castor try to generate
> different classes for same-named elements using the same type?
>
> As Werner said in a follow-up that appeared after I started
> this message, the Unmarshaller changes that are causing
> problems for you actually reduce your risk of using code in a
> way that compiles fine but generates exceptions at runtime.
> If you have elements using the same name but with different
> types, Castor must somehow resolve this. If the types are
> truly different, then you need to generate separate classes
> for the elements. The old resolution (overwrite and ignore)
> works fine when the types are identical.
I completely agree with this. When I realized the difference, I
appreciated it. We just have to deal with the transition. We have
control over the schemas, so we'll decide which strategy is best.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
