Hi Ric, another user has also reported problems with binding file at http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-1867. We'll try to investigate what happend and come back to you soon.
Thanks for your analysis and report of the problem. Ralf Ric Klaren schrieb: > Hi, > > While upgrading to castor 1.1 I've run into a what looks to me strange > change in the binding file syntax. (Or I've been abusing the syntax so > far ;) ) > > A small example: > > ---- my castorbuilder.properties: > org.exolab.castor.builder.javaclassmapping=type > org.exolab.castor.builder.javaVersion=5.0 > ---- > > --- My XSD cut down to the basics: > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified"> > > <xs:complexType name="TypeA"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="Yadda"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > > <xs:complexType name="TypeB"> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="Yadda"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > > <xs:complexType name="Types"> > <xs:choice> > <xs:element name="TypeA" type="TypeA"/> > <xs:element name="TypeB" type="TypeB"/> > </xs:choice> > </xs:complexType> > > <xs:element name="Foo"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name="Bar" type="Types"/> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:schema> > > With castor 1.0.5 I used the following binding: > > <binding xmlns="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding" > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding > C:\\Castor\\xsd\\binding.xsd" > defaultBinding="type"> > > <complexTypeBinding name="TypeA"> > <java-class name="TypeA" package="my.org.type_a"/> > <elementBinding name="Yadda"> > <java-class name="Yadda" package="my.org.type_a"/> > </elementBinding> > </complexTypeBinding> > > <complexTypeBinding name="TypeB"> > <java-class name="TypeB" package="my.org.type_b"/> > <elementBinding name="Yadda"> > <java-class name="Yadda" package="my.org.type_b"/> > </elementBinding> > </complexTypeBinding> > </binding> > > Which did not work with Castor 1.1 anymore (e.g. conflicts between > generated classes appeared). I'm not sure wether I screwed something > up with the syntax from the start... So I looked at the docs and > thougth I would have to replace the name attribute with: > > ... > <complexTypeBinding name="complexType:TypeA"> > ... > > This did not help it turns out I had to change things to: > > <binding .... > <complexTypeBinding name="/complexType:TypeA"> > ... > </complexTypeBinding> > > <complexTypeBinding name="/complexType:TypeB"> > .... > </complexTypeBinding> > </binding> > > Looking at the BNF spec this seemed a bit odd to me. Anway I'm not > sure wether I've run into a problem or that I was using the wrong > syntax anyway. I hope someone can tell wether this is an oddity in > castor's codegenerator or that I've screwed up. > > As an aside note it would be nice if the codegenerator gave warnings > about unused constructs in the binding file. > > Cheers, > > Ric > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email -- Syscon Ingenieurbüro für Meß- und Datentechnik GmbH Ralf Joachim Raiffeisenstraße 11 D-72127 Kusterdingen Germany Tel. +49 7071 3690 52 Mobil: +49 173 9630135 Fax +49 7071 3690 98 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.syscon-informatics.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

