I guess working with the "location" attribute of bind-xml fullfills my needs.
grz rené
breskeby wrote:
>
> I have something like the following unchangeable pojo:
>
> class Element {
> private String Interface = "interfacedefinition";
> private String InterfaceVersion "v.1.2";
> ...
> ...
> ...
> }
>
> and i want map this class to the following xml document:
>
> ...
> <Element>
> <Interface id="v.1.2">interfacedefinition</Interface>
> </Element>
>
> my first approach doesn´t have the id attribute, so i created a mapping
> file with following content:
>
> <class name="foo.pojo.Element">
> <map-to xml="Element"/>
> <field name="interface"
> type="java.lang.String">
> <bind-xml name="Interface"
> node="element"/>
> </field>
> </class>
>
> How can I add the id attribute of an Element comfortly to the existing
> mapping? Do I really need to add an Element Class to make this mapping
> possible, or can i directly add in the definition of the id attribute to
> the mapping of the "Element" class?
>
> Thank you for help...
>
> grz
> René
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/map-a-field-as-an-element-and-add-an-id-to-that-element-tf3238479.html#a9002944
Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
