Do you have the ability to start from an XML Schema, instead of an object definition? If you defined OtherNames as a complextype containing a sequence of OtherName objects, that would match your XML, and your generated code for OtherNames would contain a collection type for the OtherName objects. You wouldn't even need (necessarily) a binding file.
> -----Original Message----- > From: bmg125 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 2:18 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [castor-user] Help needed with Mapping and XML-Binding > > > I am new to Castor and its mapping capabilities. I am > having a problem > getting my XML wrappers to look the way I want it to when > using the xml-bind > location attribute on a attribute node. Basically, what I > have in my > object is a List of strings (Names). > > That I want represented in the XML as: > > <OtherNames> > <OtherName Name="Bob" /> > <OtherName Name="Steve" /> > <OtherName Name="Chris" /> > <OtherNames> > > What I am gettings is: > > <OtherNames> > <OtherName Name= " Bob Steve Chris "/> </OtherNames> > > My mapping looks something like: > > <field name="OtherNames" type="java.lang.String" > collection="arraylist" > > <bind-xml node="attribute" name="Name" > location="OtherNames/OtherName"/> > </ field > > > Is there a way to do this in the mapping file? > Thanks in advance. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Help-needed-with-Mapping-and-XML-Binding -tf3340401.html#a9290361 > Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
