Actually, I think you meant the following:

 <elementBinding name="/loanRiskRatingRequest/@modelVersion">
  <member java-type="int" />
 </elementBinding>

That produces what I'm looking for.

It might be useful to point out that what you gave me produces a very odd 
result.  It changes the type of the variable, but it doesn't make it 
"java.lang.Integer" as you specified, it actually makes it "java.lang.Long".  
That can't be right.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:16 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: AW: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer 
> changed from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
> 
> Yes, and
> 
> <elementBinding name="/loanRiskRatingRequest/@modelVersion">
>       <member java-type="java.lang.Integer" /> </elementBinding>
> 
> Should give you your desired behaviour.
> 
> Werner
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. März 2007 21:47
> > An: [email protected]
> > Betreff: RE: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer 
> changed from 
> > int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
> > 
> > Is this all you mean?:
> > 
> >   <xs:element name="loanRiskRatingRequest">
> >     <xs:complexType>
> >       <xs:sequence>
> >         <xs:element ref="loanProperties"/>
> >       </xs:sequence>
> >       <xs:attribute name="modelVersion" use="optional" 
> type="xs:integer"/>
> >     </xs:complexType>
> >   </xs:element>
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:43 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: AW: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer changed 
> > > from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
> > >
> > > Show me a XML schema fragment with an <xs:integer> typed element 
> > > definition, and I'll provide the <elementBinding>.
> > >
> > > Werner
> > >
> > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 06. März 2007 22:15
> > > > An: [email protected]
> > > > Betreff: RE: [castor-user] Default binding of xs:integer
> > > changed from
> > > > int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 12:25 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [castor-user] Default binding of 
> xs:integer changed 
> > > > > from int to long between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, it should be able to override this using a <member> 
> > > > > element within an <*Binding>.
> > > >
> > > > From the examples on the web site, I don't see how exactly
> > > this is done.
> > > >
> > > > > Werner
> > > > >
> > > > > PS Thanks for reading the release notes .. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > From my point of view, I can interpret this two ways, so
> > > I'm not sure
> > > > which one you meant.  If you really meant to thank me for
> > > reading the
> > > > release notes, then I'll say I didn't actually read them :) , I 
> > > > determined this by trying the release.  If you mean that I
> > > should have
> > > > seen this in the release notes, how would I know where 
> the release 
> > > > notes are for this release?  I don't see any in an 
> obvious place.
> > > >
> > > > > Karr, David wrote:
> > > > > > I just tried the latest 1.1.1 snapshot this morning,
> > > and now that
> > > > > > other issues have been resolved, I'm now seeing that
> > > the default
> > > > > > binding of "xs:integer" changed from "int" to "long"
> > > > > between v0.9.6 and v1.1.1.
> > > > > > Why was this change made?  Can I override this in 
> the binding 
> > > > > > file, leaving it bound to "int"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > -
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > > > >
> > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > > >
> > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> > > 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > >
> > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> > 
> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to