That is, I now think that marshalling a Collection (in this case,
addVisitDatas) in such a way as to wrap sets of the members of the
Collection's element-type (in this case, AddVisitData) in an XML-
element
named with the name of the Collection-variable (addVisitDatas) is
preferable
to what one gets when one includes "container='false'", which wraps
such
Collection-element data in an XML-element named with the Collection
element's type (AddVisitData).
I now think that's actually more efficient, in that it saves on XML-
elements
in the way it deals with the effectively anonymous Collection-
elements.
You might also want to have a look at the "location" attribute:
http://castor.codehaus.org/xml-mapping.html#6.-Location-attribute
Henk van Voorthuijsen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
