Thanks! I'll pass on your suggestion, and report back any resistance. Dave
On 4/3/07, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I would recommend to switch to 1.0.5 at least, if not 1.1. If you do not want to regenerate code from the client's XMl schema(s), just don't. Castor's (un)marshalling framework will be able to deal with this. Having said that, I'd really like to understand why your customer is that reluctant to switch to e.g. 1.0.5 or 1.1. After all, there's plenty of bug fixes that have been committed when working towards 1.0, and quite some (minor) regression issues have been fixed as well after 1.0 (GA). Werner ------------------------------ *Von:* Dave_Thomas mailing lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 03. April 2007 02:17 *An:* [email protected] *Betreff:* [castor-user] Upgrading from 0.9.3 At this site, the customer is reluctant to move to a more recent Castor. We use it exclusively for XML mapping, no JDO. If we wanted to swap the libraries to at least 0.9.9, is this a relatively painless process? With/without regenerating code? Any further ammunition is appreciated! Thanks Dave
