Hi Werner,

I get the picture. It is not certain that this issue will be resolved in
R1.1.1.2.
I understand also your current living/situation.
Well I was was considering the option of diving into the source code
myself. After having debugged and traced the marshalling execution I
decide not to continue.
Is there any specific design documentation on castor xml? I would like
have some overview of the castor marshalling situation.

Thanks
Urso

" Werner Guttmann"
> Urso,
>
> there's a user that has offered some of his time to help us with this
> issie. Unfortunately, I have not heard back since that initial offer.
>
> We'll try to get CASTOR-1342 into 1.1.2, but I don't think that this
> will be possible without any additional help from the community. I for
> myself, am trying to find a balance between my desire to spend as much
> time as possible with my second daughter (and the mother behind this
> little miracle) that was born a few weeks ago, my role as a committer
> with an open source project and my day job (from which I tend to make a
> living)
>
> Having said that, if somebody was to offer me (or the project) some
> incentive to pick this issue up and deal with it according to your
> (professional) priorities, I am sure this would be picked up immediately.
>
> If that's not an option, please have a look at the (preliminary) patches
> attached to the issue and see whether you can help us coming up with a
> solution. As far as I remember, there's plenty of guidelines and
> suggestions already available.
>
> Regards
> Werner
>
> Urso G.R. Wieske wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I have checke with JIRA and issue "CASTOR-1342 UNRESOLVED  Proxied
>> classes
>> need to be identified and receive special processing" is planned to be
>> resolved in the next release 1.1.2 of Castor.
>>
>> I have put my hope on this release since I am hoping that this issue is
>> resoved in R1.1.2.
>> This issue with marshalling has been on the agenda for a long time.
>> Until this morning (June 11th, 2007) I check the status of this issue,
>> but
>> it's still unresolved.
>>
>> Can someone of the team say if this issue is likely to be resolved in
>> the
>> next release? (It is next week already release 1.1.2)
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Urso
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to