Thanks! The trick worked!!
Werner Guttmann wrote: > > I think a field mapping similar to > > <field name="person.name" type="string"> > <bind-xml name="Name" node="attribute" /> > </field> > > should do the trick. > > Werner > > sweex wrote: >> Hi!!! >> >> It's me again with another question. >> >> I'm doing a mapping for X class. X class has a field of type Person where >> it >> is another field (name) who's get and set methods are getName and >> setName. >> Well, what I want to do is access from the mapping of X class the name >> field's get and set methods. Something like: >> >> \<class name=\"X\" \> >> \<field name=\"Name\" type=... /> >> \<\/class> >> >> Thanks!! >> >> Regards > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mapping-XML---access-directly-a-field-is-not-in-the-mapping%27s-class-tf3963598.html#a11282702 Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
