The XML that is generated is this:
<a1>a1</a1>
<bObject>
<a2>a2</a2>
</bObject>
<bObject>
<b1>b1</b1>
</bObject>
As you can see, there are two bObject tags... I want to generate the
following:
<a1>a1</a1>
<bObject>
<a2>a2</a2>
<b1>b1</b1>
</bObject>
but, how? I'll continue trying.
Thanks,
Regards
Werner Guttmann wrote:
>
> What does the XML produced exactly look like ?
>
> Werner
>
> sweex wrote:
>> Thanks Werner, I understand. But, I don't get what I want. I want to
>> unify
>> the B's mapping with a2 attribute's mapping:
>>
>> class name="A"
>> field name="a1" type=...
>> field name="a2" type=...
>> bind-xml name="a2" location="bObject" node="element"
>> \field
>> field name="bObject" type="B"
>> bind-xml name="bObject" \
>> \class
>>
>> class name="B"
>> field name="b1" type=...
>> field name="b2" type=...
>> \class
>>
>> As a result, the a2 attribute is mapped into a new bObject tag... What is
>> what I'm doing wrong?
>>
>> Thanks for all
>>
>> Regards
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-class%27s-attribute-inside-B-class-in-XML-tf3974727.html#a11300407
Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
