Hi

I created the issue CASTOR-2031 related to this email as you asked me.

There is as attachment the XML schema file used to reproduce the test case.

I don't know how to link the issue with CASTOR-1990. How should I do that ?

Regards,
Pascal




On 6/27/07, Pascal Maugeri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No problem Werner I can fill in an issue in JIRA. I sent this email as
I was not sure if this was due to a misunderstanding of mine or a
misuse.

I do that right away !

And yes I know you're very busy and I'll be patient, don't worry ;-)

Regards,
Pascal

On 6/27/07, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pascal,
>
> can you please create a new Jira issue at
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR
>
> and attach all relevant files that help me to replay your problem. If
> possible, link this new issue to CASTOR-1990 as well, so that it is
> clear to me that these two issues are related.
>
> As always, apologies for not having looked at CASTOR-1990 yet, but the
> number of issues being reported right now is (exceptionally) high. It
> looks like the release of Castor 1.1 ff for the first time convinced
> many users to switch away from oldish releases such as 0.9.4.x et alias.
>
> Please rest assured that your issue will be looked at, but that our
> resources are limited by nature (as with almost all open source
> projects, as our work is based upon voluntary contributions).
>
> Regards
> Werner
>
> Pascal Maugeri wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > While processing an IETF XML schema I encountered a problem with the
> > marshaling of a simpleType base on string.
> >
> > I tryed to reduced the problem to a smaller XML schema to make things
> > easier to understand (let me know if you prefer the IETF references):
> >
> > [...]
> >     <element name="ruleset">
> >         <complexType>
> >             <sequence>
> >                 <element name="rule" type="tns:extensibleType"></element>
> >             </sequence>
> >         </complexType>
> >     </element>
> >
> >     <xs:complexType name="extensibleType">
> >         <xs:sequence>
> >             <xs:any namespace="##other" minOccurs="0"
> > maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> >         </xs:sequence>
> >     </xs:complexType>
> >
> >     <element name="allow-invite" type="tns:AllowInviteType"></element>
> >
> >     <simpleType name="AllowInviteType">
> >         <restriction base="string">
> >             <enumeration value="accept"></enumeration>
> >             <enumeration value="reject"></enumeration>
> >         </restriction>
> >     </simpleType>
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > I construct a document with the following java code:
> >
> >  Ruleset ruleset = new Ruleset();
> >  Rule rule = new Rule();
> >  ruleset.setRule(rule);
> >  rule.addAnyObject(AllowInviteType.ACCEPT);
> >
> > And marshal ruleset it produces the following:
> >
> >  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >  <ruleset xmlns="http://www.example.org/test2";>
> >      <rule>
> >          <AllowInviteType
> >            xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> > xsi:type="AllowInviteType"/>
> >      </rule>
> >  </ruleset>
> >
> > In fact I've seen two problems:
> >
> > a) it should rather generate the value of the AllowInvite instead such as:
> >    <AllowInviteType>ACCEPT</AllowInviteType>,
> >
> > b) I expect to see '<AllowInvite>'  and not '<AllowInviteType>'. This
> > is related to issue 1990 I reported previously.
> >
> > Regards
> > Pascal
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
> >
> >    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to