Dear users,
a more recent Jira issue has identified a problem that relates to the
use of the XML code generator in the context of anonymous enumerations.
Currently, Castor does 'misbehave' a bit, and that incorrect behaviour
needs to be fixed. Problem is that a potential fix *will* break existing
code, as we are changing how things are marshalled to/unmarshalled from.
As such, I'd like to get an idea how common it is for our users to use
an XML schema construct such as follows:
<xs:element name="sub-handling">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:token">
<xs:enumeration value="block" />
<xs:enumeration value="confirm" />
<xs:enumeration value="polite-block" />
<xs:enumeration value="allow" />
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
where the enumeration is defined locally to the element 'sub-handling'
and not as part of a global (read named) simple type definition.
For those of you interested in the details, please have a look at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CASTOR-1990
as well and join us on the discussions.
Any feedback appreciated.
Regards
Werner
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
