Hi Werner, Thanks for the reply. I looked into the Unmarshallistener class. I have one more question. If for eg., there are a very large number of persons in the xml, the unmarshal method() in my client code seems to require me to define a container class like "Persons" which holds a list of Person objects and returns the container class, here an instance of Persons.Is it possible to get around this as I dont want the unmarshaller to store the large number of person objects in the list(in memory) of my container class. I would rather just use the listener and decide if i want to store them in mem or not.
Thanks. Werner Guttmann wrote: > > Hi, > > have a look at the UnmarshalListener as documented here: > > http://castor.org/javadoc/org/exolab/castor/xml/UnmarshalListener.html > > Regards > Werner > > kirran wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Any help is sincerely appreciated. >> >> sample xml >> --- >> <person name="tom"/> >> <person name="brady"/> >> >> >> class Person{ >> private name; >> public void setName(String name){ >> this.name=name; >> } >> } >> >> When i use castor, it gives me a collection of person objects. What i >> need >> is a callback in my client code after each person >> >> element is parsed into an object sequentially so that i can invoke >> operations on each object. This is also inline with my req. >> >> of not storing an entire collection of persons in memory at once. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/castor-user-issue-tf4734226.html#a13593512 Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
