Hi,
 I do not have enough experience with castor (yet) to see either method
being beneficial over the other ... so I will take what ever you suggest. 
 Working from the snapshot is not an issue, nor is waiting a couple of days
a problem - what ever is best for you - I'll be happy when it is working!
 
 I do have a couple of class to marshal and these include quite a few
classes (30+) which are included in the output structure - I am not sure if
this would be an issue with option b (do I have to add a
classDescriptionResolver for each class ?).

 Many, many thanks for the super response on this, I am suitably impressed 
:-)

Thanks,
  Brian 



Werner Guttmann wrote:
> 
> Well, in that case, there's two options:
> 
> a) switch to XMLContext (where we'd have to add a setClassLoader()
> method, which is sufficiently easy; if you are fine working against a
> snapshot releaswe, this could be done within one or two days).
> 
> b) Set an XMLClassDescriptorResolver on your Marshaller, and use
> XMLClassDescriptorResolver.setClassLoader() to set a custom class loader.
> 
> Does this make sense ...
> 
> Werner
> 
> 
> brandywheat wrote:
>> Hi, 
>>  I'm on the latest castor version (1.2) ... 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Brian 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Werner Guttmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What version of Castor are you using ? There's a solution to this
>>> problem, but it depends on whether you are on a release that has support
>>> for XMLContext already (or not).
>>>
>>> Werner
>>>
>>> brandywheat wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>  I am currently having problems with the castor marshaller and
>>>> classloaders. 
>>>>  My code works in the unit tests but fails once included in a netbeans
>>>> RPC -
>>>> the problem looks to be the classloader and the modules within the RPC. 
>>>>  
>>>>  I can resolve the issue of the classloader with the code:
>>>>       Marshaller m = new Marshaller();
>>>>       Mapping mapping = new
>>>> Mapping(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader());
>>>>       mapping.loadMapping("c:\\temp\\mapping.xml");
>>>>       m.setMapping(mapping);
>>>>       m.marshal(this, writer);
>>>>
>>>>  But this forces me to write a mapping file, which I do not have
>>>> available
>>>> and do not really want to generate.
>>>>
>>>>  Is it possible to set the classloader for the marshaller without
>>>> having
>>>> to
>>>> define a mapping file, e.g. have it use the default structure it would
>>>> generated without a mapping file? (If I skip the loadMapping then the
>>>> setMapping gives an exception saying a mapping must be loaded
>>>> first....)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in Advance,
>>>>   Brian 
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Changing-classloader-in-marshaller-tp17480800p17490096.html
Sent from the Castor - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to