Wherever it fits fro you. Just push a URL towards us at some point of time.
Werner Benson Margulies wrote: > Ok, I'll do some writing. I think I'll write on the CXF confluence site > under the subject of 'how to create a data binding'. > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Benson Margulies wrote: >>> Werner, >>> >>> Adding a data binding to CXF is not quite trivial, but the interfaces >>> required are reasonably well-bounded. If I were going to do it, I'd start >> by >>> reading the Aegis code (since I rewrote a lot of it), but there's also >> the >>> xmlbeans binding to look at. >>> >>> I'm not quite sure where to start in telling you where to start. If I >> said, >>> 'Check out the current CXF trunk from SVN, and look at the >>> rt/databinding/aegis project,' I don't know if I'd be insulting your >>> intelligence. >> Not at all .... as long as you are prepared to answer some questions, >> and - more importantly - point me to small samples that showcase the >> possible usage. >> >>> I could also send along a quick explanation of the major >>> interfaces involved. >> Yes, it that's after you have introduced me to the main ideas. And it's >> fine pointing me to e.g. existing HOW-TOs, getting started documents, etc. >>> On the positive side, a Castor binding would be a wonderful thing insofar >> as >>> it could do wsdl2java, which Aegis cannot. >> :-). >> >>> I'm probably being confused about licensing. I'm fairly new to the Apache >>> scene. There are some components (e.g. Xom) that we cannot use in CXF due >> to >>> Apache licensing rules. >>> >>> --benson >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Werner Guttmann < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Benson Margulies wrote: >>>>> I'm a CXF committer and I'm kind of the current foster-parent of the >>>> Aegis >>>>> binding. >>>>> >>>>> Since CXF has to be able to deliver a WSDL, and a WSDL has to include >>>>> schema, we'd need that. I've barely scratched the surface of castor, >> but >>>>> other than that it looks quite straightforward. >>>> Yes, it does .. ;-). >>>> >>>> Okay, where to start. There's a few tools out there for which there's >>>> some level of Castor integration, e.g. Spring-WS, Apache Cocoon, XFire, >>>> Mule, etc. Most of these tools tend to use the XML data binding >>>> functionality of Castor only. Some of those glue code bits have been >>>> provided by myself .. ;-). >>>> >>>>> If you/we wanted to do wsdl2java, then someone would have to deal with >>>> the >>>>> 'tooling', which is more complex, and connect it to your code >> generator. >>>> Sure. What would you propose ... ? >>>>> there's also the question of license compatibility if you wanted to >>>>> contribute it to CXF. >>>> In what sense ? >>>> >>>>> Please don't say, 'JAXB'-compatible :-) JAXB has a number of >> unfortunate >>>>> aspects, I'd hope you all do better. >>>> Yes, it has, but you have to make a difference between a specification >>>> and the reference implementation. And yes, you are correct that even the >>>> spec is somewhat ill-designed with regards to some aspects. >>>> >>>> But when I use the term 'JAXB compliance', it does not imply that the >>>> remainder of Castor (nnot covered by the JAXB spec, but very useful) >>>> will vanish .. ;-). >>>> >>>> Werner >>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Ralf Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Benson, >>>>>> >>>>>> you seam to have investigated CXF. >>>>>> >>>>>> What would be required for a CXF binding for Castor? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you in a position to contribute that? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Ralf >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Benson Margulies schrieb: >>>>>>> I'd certainly test it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Changing the subject, I also wonder if someone would like to see a >> CXF >>>>>>> data binding for Castor. That feature would be an important enabler >> of >>>> a >>>>>>> code-first Castor data binding for CXF. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Joachim Grüneis < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>> >>>>>>> currently: not really >>>>>>> >>>>>>> there is a way to create a schema for a XML file... but that >> isn't >>>>>> the >>>>>>> same then using the Java classes as a base >>>>>>> >>>>>>> one of our Google Summer of Code students is currently working to >>>>>>> implement the feature you like to have... but you have to wait >>>>>>> >>>>>>> do you like to help us? e.g. by testing the new feature? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have fun >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Joachim >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2008/5/28 Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >>>>>>> > I've got a set of classes that I'm planning to marshal and >>>>>>> unmarshal with >>>>>>> > with Castor. I don't have any mapping files (yet) -- I'm not >> very >>>>>>> picky >>>>>>> > about how they get marshalled. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Is there some way to get Castor to spit out an XML Schema so >> that >>>>>>> I can >>>>>>> > create XML documents in some other tool that can be >> unmarshalled >>>>>>> into these >>>>>>> > objects? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>> >>>> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
