Hello Werner,
I've tuned Spring-WS, by replacing message factory and message sender
implementation, from SaajSoapMessageFactory to AxiomSoapMessageFactory,
and from HttpUrlConnectionMessageSender to CommonsHttpMessageSender, and
experienced a dramatic performance increase with big message payloads,
from ~10min down to 10-15sec.
Regards,
Stevo.
Werner Guttmann wrote:
So the difference only occurs when spring-ws is added to the technology
stack, correct. If that's the case, feel free to supply us with the
complete code (incl. instructions how to replay the problem=, and we'll
be having a look. Please try to be as minimal as possible, though.
Regards
Werner
Stevo Slavić wrote:
Hello Werner,
Thank you for reply. I've created a test, generating 4000 instances and
tried to marshall and unmarshall them, and it was all done under a
second! This brings me to another problem, finding what else is causing
such a long time to process. I'm using Castor Marshaller to marshall and
unmarshall parameters of a web service method, and same
marshaller/unmarshaller is configured to be used by Spring WS when
making web service calls.
Regards,
Stevo.
Werner Guttmann wrote:
Without a bit of code to look at, providing you with hints/answers will
be difficult. Would you be willing to provide us with a test case ?
Regards
Werner
Stevo Slavić wrote:
Hello all,
It took Castor 10 minutes and 22 seconds to unmarshall 3835 occurrences
of element named "person" in an XML document with structure as in
following example:
<persons>
<person>
<user>
<username>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</username>
<password>aPassword</password>
<enabled>true</enabled>
<activated>true</activated>
<activationCode>anActivationCode</activationCode>
</user>
</person>
<person>
...
</person>
...
</persons>
A "person" can also have a "profile" element which is more complex than
"user" element, while both "user" and "profile" are optional. XML
document that was unmarshalled for every "person" had only "user" as
subelements. It looks simple to me and I expected it to be unmarshalled
in far less time. Such my expectations were based on the fact that it
took 10 seconds on side that marshalled object tree into XML, but using
Axis 1.
Castor (un)marshaller was not used directly but through Spring-OXM
module, all within a Spring framework based web application, deployed on
a laptop with Intel T7500 2.2GHz CPU and 4GB of memory, Vista x64 with
Java 6 VM and Tomcat 6 tweaked to take 1280MB of memory and use parallel
garbage collector.
I'm looking for answers why it took Castor so long to complete, and how
should I tweak it to perform a lot better? Any suggestions are
appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Stevo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Stevo Slavić
Senior Software Developer
Levi9 Global Sourcing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Jan van Goyenkade 8, 1075 HP Amsterdam, The Netherlands
( (+31) (0) 20 6701 947
È (+381) (0) 63 7 258 458
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
^ Skype: sslavic
ü http://www.levi9.com/
Chamber of commerce Levi9 Global Sourcing BV: 34221951
Chamber of commerce Levi9 Global Sourcing Benelux BV: 34224746
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not (one of) the intended recipient(s), please notify the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments
permanently without retaining a copy. Any review, disclosure, copying,
distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
e-mail by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The services of Levi9 are exclusively subject to its general terms and
conditions. These general terms and conditions can be found on
http://www.levi9.com/ and a copy will be promptly submitted to you on
your request and free of charge.
