Hi,

I have logged a defect for this issue, the number is 2468.

Just wondering has anyone had a chance to look at it?

Thanks,
Alex.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Herriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 July 2008 13:06
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [castor-user] xmlns="" problem

Hi Werner,

I just logged a defect for this problem, the number is 2468

Thanks,
Alex.

-----Original Message-----
From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 July 2008 20:37
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [castor-user] xmlns="" problem

Sorry, but I asked Alex (and as such you as well) to create a Jira
issue. Can you please do so (as well) ?

Werner

Paco Sanchez wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have the same problem. If I append xmlns="" to every xml element
then the
> whole object is unmarshaled correctly. If I don't, the unmarshaller
tell me
> that "The field '_peticion' (whose xml name is  'peticion') is a
required
> field of class 'MensajeSalida". I've attached the xsd file.
> 
> http://www.nabble.com/file/p18343825/ws.xsd ws.xsd 
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> 
> Werner Guttmann wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> can you please create a new Jira issue and attach a simple (sic!) XML
>> schema so that I can generate the sources myself, and a test case
that
>> allows me to reproduce the problem you are facing within your client.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Werner
>>
>> Alex Herriott wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I am having a problem marshalling a message between castor 0.9.5.4
and
>>> 1.2.1.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> On the server I have castor 0.9.5.4, the message source has been
>>> generated with this version and also this version is being used to
>>> marshal the object so it can be sent to the client
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> On the client there is castor 1.2.1. Here version 1.2.1 is being
used to
>>> generate the message source for the client and unmarshal the
incoming
>>> message.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The same xsd is being used for source generation
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> the message that is generated from the server (0.9.5.4) is the
following
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> <Rq xmlns="http://www.aaa.com";>< AbcDet>1</AbcDet></Rq>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> When this is unmarshaled on the client (v 1.2.1) the 'AbcDet' is
missing
>>> from the object.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> If I add and empty namespace declaration to the AbcDet on the
incoming
>>> message e.g.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> <Rq xmlns="http://www.aaa.com";>< AbcDet xmlns="">1</AbcDet></Rq>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Then the whole object is unmarshaled correctly.
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I have looked the following suggestion
>>> http://osdir.com/ml/java.castor.devel/2003-03/msg00168.html and
added
>>> elementFormDefault="qualified"
>>>
>>> to the xsd however this did not solve the problem
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Any suggestions why is castor 1.2.1 not unmarshaling object
correctly
>>> when there is no empty namespace? 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alex.
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to