You cannot use version 1.2 and higher with the current release of the
snapshot plugin. You will have to switch using the (most) current
snapshot of the plugin (which automatically pulls Castor 1.2).

Regards
Werner

Thomas Vaughan wrote:
> I'm using the 1.0 version of the plugin with castor-1.0.4, here's the
> relevant pom.xml snippet:
> 
>       <plugin>
>         <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
>         <artifactId>castor-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>         <version>1.0</version>
>         <dependencies>
>             <dependency>
>               <groupId>org.codehaus</groupId>
>               <artifactId>castor</artifactId>
>               <version>1.0.4</version>
>             </dependency>
>         </dependencies>
> 
> I'll try your simpleTypeBinding name="/enumType:Inquiry_Status" syntax
> in my current setup and then see what happens if I bump up to castor-1.2
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Is there a known case-sensitivty issue with
> code generated data types?
> 
> What version of the Maven plugin are you using ? And what version of
> Castor does the plugin actually source ?
> 
> Werner
> 
> Thomas Vaughan wrote:
>> Thanks for the pointer, Werner.
>>
>> I tried following up on that advice, but ran in to some trouble. .
>> .perhaps you can quickly spot something I'm doing wrong?
>>
>> I get this error when running the maven goal:
>>      Unable to load a binding file due to the following:
>>      unable to find FieldDescriptor for 'simpleTypeBinding' in
>> ClassDescriptor of binding
>>      The Source Generator will continue with no binding file.
>>
>> My binding file looks like:
>> <binding xmlns="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding"; 
>>          xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
>>  
>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.castor.org/SourceGenerator/Binding
>>                              http://www.castor.org/binding.xsd"; 
>>          defaultBinding="element">
>>
>>    <simpleTypeBinding name="/Inquiry_Status">
>>       <java-class name="Foo"/>
>>    </simpleTypeBinding>           
>> </binding>
>>
>>
>> The simple type I'm trying to play around with is:
>>      <xs:simpleType name="Inquiry_Status">
>>              <xs:restriction base="xm:RequiredString">
>>                      <xs:enumeration value="SUCCESS"/>
>>                      <xs:enumeration value="Success"/>
>>                      <xs:enumeration value="FAILED"/>
>>              </xs:restriction>
>>      </xs:simpleType>
>>
>>
>> The problem seems to live with the "simpleTypeBinding" . . . if I try
> an
>> elementBinding on an element, it works fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> P.S. I know that <java-class> isn't going to solve my particular
>> problem, but I'm just trying to get something to work correctly on
> these
>> simpleTypes before digging too much deeper.  
>>
>> P.P.S. I'll get rid of the http://www.castor.org/binding.xsd xsi
>> schemaLocation. . .it's just there in a development context.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:57 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Is there a known case-sensitivty issue with
>> code generated data types?
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> there's nothing we can do about this, as this is what we call a naming
>> conflict. Castor - when generating Java sources for your simple type
>> definition - will try to use the enumeration facet values to derive a
>> constant definition name. As we simply convert to upper case letters
> by
>> default, this will cause problems for you.
>>
>> Having said that, you can always use a binding file to provide the
>> Castor code generator with a custom name for e.g. the 'Success' facet.
>>
>> Regards
>> Werner Guttmann
>>
>> Thomas Vaughan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> My apologies if this is an open issue (I tried searching for this
>> issue,
>>> but no luck).
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> I've got an xsd with a simpleType string like this:
>>>
>>> <xs:simpleType name="Inquiry_Status">
>>>
>>>       <xs:restriction base="xm:RequiredString">
>>>
>>>             <xs:enumeration value="SUCCESS"/>
>>>
>>>             <xs:enumeration value="Success"/>
>>>
>>>             <xs:enumeration value="FAILED"/>
>>>
>>>       </xs:restriction>
>>>
>>> </xs:simpleType>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Notice the 2 spellings of "SUCCESS" and "Success"
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> When running the castor-maven plugin (dependent on castor-1.0.4)
>> against
>>> this XSD, the generated code appears to get confused about the case
>>> sensitivity:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Notice that the 2nd spelling of "Success" gets picked up as the type
>> but
>>> the 1st version gets added as a Hash key. . . 
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> public class Inquiry_Status implements java.io.Serializable {
>>>
>>>     public static final int SUCCESS_TYPE = 1;
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>     public static final Inquiry_Status SUCCESS = new
>>> Inquiry_Status(SUCCESS_TYPE, "Success");
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>     public static final int FAILED_TYPE = 2;
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>     public static final Inquiry_Status FAILED = new
>>> Inquiry_Status(FAILED_TYPE, "FAILED");
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>     //  . . . snip . . .
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>     private static java.util.Hashtable init()
>>>
>>>     {
>>>
>>>         Hashtable members = new Hashtable();
>>>
>>>         members.put("SUCCESS", SUCCESS);
>>>
>>>         members.put("FAILED", FAILED);
>>>
>>>         return members;
>>>
>>>     } //-- java.util.Hashtable init() 
>>>
>>>             
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The "simple" answer to just change the XSD isn't, unfortunately,
>>> possible in this situation.  Does anyone know of a work-around or
>>> version fix for this problem?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Tom Vaughan | Technical Architect | direct 212 798 7367  | mobile 703
>>> 623 7101 | fax 212 966 6915   
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to