In addition we are discussing about a separate module because pull
parsing depends on StaX API which already is part of Java 6. I still
share Joachim's opinion not to create a new module for pull parsing.

Just my 0.02 cent.
Ralf


Joachim Grüneis schrieb:
> Hello
> 
> I'm still not sure that heading Castor towards many small projects is
> the best way to go...
> Never the less - I'll be upload a patch for 2408 that will have the
> fragmentmapper  in an own module
> 
> I want to state the pros and contras...
> 
> Contra is that the Castor users will have a harder time when they have
> to decide (and therefor know) the purpose of each module to use it for
> their own purpose.
> The second contra is not so easily to describe. Lets say we have
> reached many small modules... then everyone will work on the small
> modules and the complete project will loose its focus. But testing is
> currently done for the complete project through two integration test
> suites. Those two test suites will also loose focus as only the small
> modules are checked out.
> The current modules of Castor are built one on top of the other (at
> least for the major modules). If we will now check out only one of the
> small modules (e.g. XML only) and work on it we might 'destroy' one of
> the dependent modules.
> The Eclipse configuration - if checking out multiple modules for one
> issue - will be harder.
> 
> As for the pros:
> The thought to work on a small module instead of the complete Castor
> trunk is charming.
> Local dependencies - managed through Maven - instead of heaving all in
> a big project is also nice.
> 
> Anyhow - there is no alternative to use modules at all - we should
> just be wary to create to many of them.
> 
> Regards
> Joachim
> 
> - hard to know for users which parts of Caster they need
> - more modules forces us to work on the small modules instead of the complete
> 
> 2008/12/12 Werner Guttmann <[email protected]>:
>> Any updates (about a month later) ? Any incremental patches worth
>> attaching ?
>>
>> Werner
>>
>> Joachim Grüneis wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm currently converting the ANTLR stuff to JavaCC - to be exact I
>>> first searched for a ready JavaCC solution, which I didn't find, and
>>> now I rewrite the ANTLR grammer to JavaCC to reduce the dependencies
>>> and technologies we use...
>>>
>>> Joachim
>>>
>>> 2008/11/13 Werner Guttmann <[email protected]>:
>>>> Joachim,
>>>>
>>>> any progress on your side ? An opinion ? An updated Maven POM ? Anything
>>>> ? I am sure you have read the mentor agreement you have signed with
>>>> Google, right ?
>>>>
>>>> Werner
>>>>
>>>> Joachim Grüneis wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> after adapting the existing pull purser patch I'm not 100% sure if we
>>>>> should have it in the main source tree of Castor...
>>>>> it requires StAX API's, StAX implementation and two ANTLR libraries
>>>>> maybe - even that it is a very small piece of code - we should have it
>>>>> in an own project?
>>>>>
>>>>> what is your opinion?
>>>>>
>>>>> Joachim
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/10/23 Werner Guttmann <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> any chances of committing yourself to a firm deadline? I would like to
>>>>>> ship 1.3 final any time soon, and I do not want to be waiting for weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Werner
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Joachim Grüneis wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I plan to add it to the code base within the next days...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Joachim
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008/10/22 Werner Guttmann <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>> Hi Joachim,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> what are your plans of committing the pull-parsing add-on that has been
>>>>>>>> developed as part of GSoC 2008 ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Werner
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>>
>>>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>>
>>>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>>
>>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to